Search This Blog

Inside Alex Honnold’s Tricked-Out New Adventure Van

Back in 2014, pro climber Alex Honnold gave us a tour of the 2002 Ford Econoline E150 he used as his mobile base camp. That van served him...

Top strip

Thursday, September 6, 2018

Want to get your guidance

Have you used this product before? Should I buy it to try? My hair is so bad that my friend recommended me to buy it. Have you used it before?

submitted by /u/brownjun
[link] [comments]

from Outdoors https://ift.tt/2Nf6RGH

The Fine Art of Unpacking Gear

Building Out a Box Truck in Baja

Give Kids Bikes, Not Helmets

This past July, the Herald News in Fall River, Massachusetts, reported that the Somerset police were handing out $5 ice cream gift certificates to kids cycling with helmets on. With the ice cream came the following admonition:

While the ice cream giveaway if fun, the effort also came with a stern reminder from police of what is required: “We would like to remind you that any person 16 years of age or younger operating a bicycle or being carried as a passenger on a bicycle on a public way, bicycle path or on any other public right-of-way shall wear a helmet. Said helmet shall fit the person’s head, shall be secured to the person’s head by straps while the bicycle is being operated.”

The next day, one of the happy ice cream recipients, a 6-year-old boy, was killed by a driver while riding on a bike path:

The day before the fatal crash, Somerset police spotted the boy bike riding with his father and gave him a gift certificate to a local ice cream shop because he was wearing a helmet.

“I guess it's kind of ironic in a very sad way,” said Somerset Police Chief George McNeil. “(It’s) just a tragic accident.”

This was “just a tragic accident,” really? No. This was a crash—not an accident—and it was one that was waiting to happen. Indeed, after the crash, local residents went and installed their own stop signs.

As for irony, well, it’s one thing to dismiss tragedies as “ironic” while you’re doing bong hits on the couch; it’s quite another when you’re the chief of police and a motorist has just killed a child. Here’s the definition of irony the police chief appears to be invoking:

a (1) : incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result

It’s almost impossible to imagine a law enforcement officer blithely throwing up his hands in any other situation in which a child has been killed—but, of course, when the death is caused by a driver it’s just a simple “accident,” nothing to see here, please move along. That a motorist killed a child on a bicycle despite the fact that he was wearing a helmet is in no way ironic. Indeed, given our ass-backwards approach to road safety, it’s very much the “normal or expected result.” If anything, handing out ice cream cones instead of addressing glaring infrastructure problems, then calling the death of a child “just a tragic accident” is way more negligent than it is ironic. It also fits one colloquial definition of insanity, which is this:

Trying the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

Yes, giving away helmets and/or delicious reinforcements for wearing said helmets is a time-honored tactic when it comes to politicians and municipalities who wish to create the illusion they’re actually doing something to protect children. New York State Senator Simcha Felder has also done the ice-cream-for-helmets thing, though when it comes to actual policy, he's attempted to raise speed limits and kill school zone speed cameras. All across the country, local governments and organizations dispense free helmets by the thousands in ostensible displays of concern and munificence, to the extent that no matter where you live, it’s just as easy to score a gratis foam safety hat as it is a complimentary gluten-free mac and cheese sample while browsing the aisles at Trader Joe’s. Yet here we are, still in a deep trough when it comes to the number of kids who still ride bikes.

Unfortunately, when it comes to encouraging kids to ride bikes and keeping them safe, helmet giveaways are the ultimate cop-out. They’re a symptom, not a cure, and tossing free helmets at our deadly driving epidemic is like throwing your empty pistol at the advancing T-1000 Terminator android before turning tail and running away. And it’s doubly insulting when the agencies giving away the helmets are the same ones that are directly responsible for street safety—your local transportation department or police precinct foisting a helmet on you is like your restaurant server presenting you with a barf bag along with your food order.

It’s no coincidence that the safest countries for cycling have the lowest rate of helmet usage: this is because the more cyclists there are, the safer cycling becomes. In fact, there’s plenty of evidence that putting too much emphasis on helmets discourages cycling. Want to keep kids on bikes safe? Give them more safe places to ride and encourage them to do so. Instead of giving them ice cream for cycling in helmets, why not just give them ice cream for cycling? Instead of giving them free helmets, why not just give them free bikes? As it is, giving away free helmets is a great way to make no difference whatsoever, if not actively make things worse. At this rate, by 2050 children will no longer ride bicycles but there will be a polystyrene island the size of Maui floating around in the Pacific.

But don’t worry, there’s still a great use for all that foam: free helmet giveaways for motorists! After all, motor vehicle collisions are a leading cause of TBI. And if helmet giveaways prove as effective in promoting driving as they have in promoting cycling, we should see the end of cars within a generation.



from Outside Magazine: All https://ift.tt/2wHyE8e

Amazon and the Local Gear Store Conundrum

Choosing the humanely sheared organic merino over the petrochemicals? I applaud your conscious consumption. But as a 20-year veteran of specialty retail—I buckled people into ski boots and skimmed a waxing iron over skis from junior high through graduate school—I’m here to tell you that where you shop matters just as much as what you buy.

Our friends in specialty retail are under attack. As Mya Frazier recently reported in Outside, neighborhood shops have the nearly impossible task of trying to compete with Amazon on cost. According to that article, the online behemoth may now move more product annually than all other outdoor merchants combined—which, at roughly $20 billion in the United States, is no small feat. What’s more, specialty retail requires us to get off our collective asses to buy something, not just press a few icons. Then there are the shops themselves, typically full of anachronistically friendly people looking to chat about local trails, avalanche conditions, hatches, and flow levels, which freaks out our increasingly Amazoned, agoraphobic, cheapskate, supine selves. Who wants that hassle? We’d rather click and wait for the UPS Brown Santa. I’m guilty too. I shop online probably a half-dozen times a year—so add hypocrite to my list, right after cheapskate.

I don’t want to live in a world without brick-and-mortar shops. It’s the people inside who matter. When I first got into mountain biking in college, the local bike shop led group rides on Monday evenings, called Monday Mud. Those sales clerks and backroom wrenches showed me where and how to ride. Today, even with mapping and social apps that make local knowledge easy to obtain, local shops welcome new users into outdoor sports. I’m no longer a newbie, but many of my riding and skiing buddies work in those shops. Life without them would make me a lonely creep. “Hey, what’s up, Brown Santa, want to shred?”

It’s also nice that most of the people working in shops care about what they do, even though retail can be low-paying and soul-crushing work. That bullshit maxim about the customers always being right? They aren’t, and they should control their unruly spawn before I do it for them. But despite the drudgery, setting somebody up with the right gear because you know the terrain and took the time to listen to their needs is rewarding. Twenty years after my own stint in retail, I still remember customers I fit boots for. Unable to ski, one had tears pooling in her eyes from arch cramps. The next time I saw her, she was gleaming. There’s a shop in Taos called the Boot Doctor because boot fitters—and bike fitters and pack fitters—alleviate pain. They simply call it service. Good luck finding that on your phone. Imagine asking Amazon to convert the tires on your new trail bike to tubeless so you don’t double flat on your maiden ride. Hold on, do you hear that? That’s the sound of e-commerce laughing.

To be fair to online retailers, many specialty shops abandoned the art of service and contributed to their own doom. Too often, you walked into a shop only to be treated with anonymous disdain by a clerk who should know you by name. Did you really just tell me that it will be two weeks before you can replace my rear derailleur in the height of riding season? Don’t you think I know the pack you’re trying to sell me is too big but is all you have left in stock? Negligent retailers take notice: Your competition is now, quite literally, in my pocket. As with manufacturers that put product over marketing to succeed, shops have to learn to lead with service. Skis and bikes and tents may be misconstrued as commodities, but service is about the type of human interaction that no “guru” on a live chat can replicate.

The good news is that forward-thinking shops are figuring this out. Those weekend group rides and runs? Turns out they’re vital to business. I buy items from shops with such community ties first. And when I do so, I end up on newsletters so they can let me know about deals. The retailer’s job is no longer done when you close out the register for the day. My son and I attend evening lectures and films at the local dive shop. Colorado’s Breck Bike Guides was conceived as a guiding operation in 2013 to help out-of-towners navigate Breckenridge’s confusing web of singletrack. Today, Breck Bike Guides is a full-service shop—and a template for community-focused, service-driven retail businesses. Quick repairs by the best mechanics in town are a given, but BBG also sponsors a regional race team, offers spinning classes taught by elite cyclists, and leads winter fat-bike tours. In the works: an espresso stand and bar (now becoming a bike shop essential) and a scheme to offer the type of healthy and fresh grab-and-go food cyclists need but can rarely find in tourist towns.

“Creating a cool culture built on service was always our goal,” says BBG co-owner Sydney Truitt. “But now we’re doubling down on that. Typically, all these initiatives come from hearing it over and over again from our customers—our friends—but the healthy food idea is just as much self-serving. People want us to specialize in cycling, and we do, but all these things are essential to cycling.”

I’m not anti-technology. The same modernity that lets me buy a mountain bike component I can’t find in town so I can be up and riding in three days also lets me work remotely for the first time in my career. Nor am I wearing blinders. Many brick-and-mortar shops will die in the coming years—and many of them should go. But one side effect of the information age is that, as individuals, we’re growing increasingly isolated. Kicking back with a beer at a local shop as they fix the sidewall on your ski and your spouse shops for a new set of poles while a film crew prepares for a show is a brief antidote to the estrangement of modernity. And we can buy it for a few dollars and a conscience.



from Outside Magazine: All https://ift.tt/2MR1ldO

The Best Affordable Performance Underwear for Men

No-Bake Peach Cobbler Recipe

A Week in Altra's Lone Peak 4 Shoes Made Me a Convert

An Outdoorperson's Guide to Surviving Los Angeles

The Best Space-Saving Travel Gear

This New Research Can Help You Decide How Much to Lift